Chocolate grinder No 2, Oil paint, thread and
Hand Made Oil Reproduction
Hand-painted oil on canvas in your size and frame, made to order by our artists. ( Buy Print
Buy Image)
P118B $10
P118H $10
P118W $10
P438Z $10
P508JH $12
P508YH $12
P805H $10
P805Z $10
P919BZ $10
P919G $10
P919XJ $10
P959ZH $10
P968JZ $12
W106C $8
W218G $10
W218JH $8
W218Y $10
W307PJ $10
W316G $10
W316PJ $8
W316Y $10
W398PJ $8
W4111J $10
W500HY $15
W500JH $15
W692G $12
W849H $8
W940BG $15
W953PJ $8
Pick from our preset sizes that match the artwork's original proportions.
You may enter your own dimensions to fit a specific frame or space. If your selected size does not match the original image's proportions, we will either crop the artwork or extend the painting with additional hand-painted elements. A digital mockup will be sent for your approval before production begins.
Please note that the on-screen preview does not reflect the actual cropping or extension. Only the mockup will accurately show the final composition.
While custom sizes are available, we recommend selecting a dimension from the predefined list to preserve the original proportions.
After order, ArtsDot.com team will email client for instructions and provide a mockup preview
Worldwide Delivery () in 3/4 weeks instead of standard 5 weeks. (17 August). No compromise on quality.
Free Worldwide Express Shipping
High-Quality Linen Canvas
Full Shipping Insurance
Customs Tax Refund Guarantee
True Color Matching Guarantee
60-Day Return Policy (Defects Only)
100% Money-Back Guarantee
Bulk Discount Offer
Chocolate grinder No 2, Oil paint, thread and
Reproduction Medium
Reproduction Size
-
Total Price
$ 263
Artwork Description
A Paradoxical Chair: Marcel Duchamp’s Chocolate Grinder No 2
Marcel Duchamp's "Chocolate Grinder No 2," painted in 1914, stands as a cornerstone of Dadaist art and a testament to the artist’s radical reimagining of artistic conventions. More than just a depiction of furniture—a simple wooden chair with a distinctive circular design featuring a central hole—the painting embodies Duchamp's profound questioning of established aesthetic hierarchies and his embrace of conceptual art, marking a decisive break from traditional representation.The Genesis of Conceptual Art
Duchamp’s artistic journey began with explorations in Cubism alongside fellow artists Picasso and Braque, absorbing the fragmented perspectives and geometric abstraction that characterized the movement. However, disillusioned by what he perceived as the limitations of visual art to convey complex ideas, Duchamp swiftly moved toward Dada—a nihilistic reaction against the horrors of World War I—rejecting artistic dogma and prioritizing intellectual provocation. “Chocolate Grinder No 2” exemplifies this shift; it’s not about skillful craftsmanship or capturing beauty but rather about presenting an everyday object – a chair – in a deliberately absurd context, forcing viewers to reconsider their assumptions about art's role in society.Style and Technique: Precision Within Chaos
Despite its Dadaist ethos, the painting demonstrates remarkable technical precision. Duchamp meticulously rendered the wooden frame of the chair with meticulous attention to detail, utilizing oil paint—a medium favored by Impressionists and Post-Impressionists—to achieve a smooth surface finish. The circular design, incorporating a hole in the center, is executed with careful consideration for form and space, mirroring the geometric principles underpinning Cubism but rejecting its illusionistic qualities. This juxtaposition of seemingly contradictory elements – calculated accuracy alongside conceptual disruption – underscores Duchamp’s artistic strategy.Historical Context: Dada's Rebellion Against Tradition
Painted during the turbulent years following the First World War, “Chocolate Grinder No 2” reflects the broader anxieties and disillusionment of the era. Dada artists rejected rational thought and embraced chance, absurdity, and anti-art sentiments as responses to the senseless violence and devastation of the conflict. Duchamp’s decision to elevate an ordinary object—the chair—to the status of artwork was a deliberate act of defiance against artistic conventions that had been perceived as elitist and detached from reality. It signaled a desire to dismantle accepted notions of beauty and originality, initiating a dialogue about what constitutes genuine artistic expression.Symbolism Beyond Appearance
The seemingly banal subject matter of “Chocolate Grinder No 2” is laden with symbolic significance. The chair itself represents domesticity and comfort—values that Dada artists deliberately undermined. However, the hole in its center symbolizes emptiness and absence, mirroring the psychological void experienced by many individuals grappling with the trauma of war. Duchamp’s appropriation of this commonplace item elevates it to an artistic statement, prompting contemplation on themes of perception, representation, and the relationship between art and everyday life.Emotional Impact: Challenging Perception
Ultimately, “Chocolate Grinder No 2” aims to unsettle viewers emotionally by disrupting their expectations. It compels us to confront our preconceived notions about art’s purpose and invites a critical examination of how we interpret visual stimuli. Duchamp's work isn't designed to elicit pleasure or admiration but rather to provoke thought—to disrupt complacency and encourage dialogue about the nature of artistic value. This enduring legacy ensures that Marcel Duchamp’s “Chocolate Grinder No 2” continues to inspire artists and collectors alike, cementing its place as a pivotal moment in the history of modern art.Related Artworks
Artist Biography
A Revolutionary Spirit: The Life and Art of Marcel Duchamp
Marcel Duchamp, born Henri-Robert-Marcel Duchamp in 1887 in Blainville-Crevon, Normandy, was more than an artist; he was a philosophical provocateur who fundamentally altered the course of modern art. His early life, though seemingly conventional – nurtured within a family that appreciated artistic expression with both brothers pursuing successful careers as artists – hinted at the iconoclasm to come. Duchamp initially pursued formal training, mastering traditional techniques and experimenting with post-impressionist styles. However, this academic foundation served not as an end in itself, but as a springboard for questioning the very nature of art, its purpose, and its definition. He wasn’t content merely to depict the world; he sought to challenge how we perceive it, and what constitutes artistic value. This restless intellectual curiosity would become the defining characteristic of his prolific career.From Cubism to Dada: A Rejection of Convention
Duchamp's artistic journey was marked by a constant evolution, a deliberate shedding of established norms. His initial engagement with Cubism, evident in works like *Portrait of Chess Players* (1911), demonstrated an interest in fragmented forms and multiple perspectives – a departure from traditional representation. Yet, he quickly moved beyond purely aesthetic concerns, recognizing that simply rearranging visual elements wasn’t enough to address the deeper questions swirling within him. The horrors of World War I fueled this discontent, leading Duchamp to embrace Dadaism, a movement born out of disillusionment and a rejection of logic, reason, and traditional artistic values. It was within the Dadaist framework that Duchamp truly began to dismantle conventional notions of art. He wasn’t interested in creating beautiful objects; he wanted to provoke thought, challenge assumptions, and expose the arbitrariness of aesthetic judgment. This period saw the birth of his most radical innovation: the ‘readymade’.The Readymades and the Subversion of Art
The introduction of readymades – ordinary manufactured objects selected and presented as art – was Duchamp’s most significant contribution to the 20th century. These weren't simply found objects; they were deliberate acts of artistic subversion. By taking an everyday item, like a urinal (*Fountain*, 1917), signing it “R. Mutt,” and submitting it to an art exhibition, Duchamp challenged the very definition of artistic skill and authorship. Was it the artist’s hand that created the work, or was it the artist's *idea*? This question became central to his practice and laid the groundwork for Conceptual Art. Other notable readymades like *L.H.O.O.Q.* (1919), a postcard reproduction of the Mona Lisa defaced with a mustache and goatee, were playful yet pointed critiques of art history and established cultural icons. These works weren’t meant to be admired for their aesthetic qualities; they were intended to provoke debate and force viewers to reconsider their preconceived notions about what constitutes art. Duchamp believed that art should reside in the mind, not merely in the eye.Legacy and Enduring Influence
Marcel Duchamp's impact on subsequent generations of artists is immeasurable. He fundamentally altered our understanding of art, paving the way for movements like Conceptual Art, Minimalism, Pop Art, and countless others. His emphasis on the artist’s idea – the concept behind the work – over its aesthetic qualities continues to inspire artists today.- Cubism: Early exploration of fractured forms and spatial representation.
- Dadaism: Rejection of logic, reason, and traditional artistic values in response to World War I.
- Conceptual Art: Emphasis on the idea behind the artwork rather than its aesthetic qualities.
Marcel Duchamp
1887 - 1968 , France
Quick Facts
- Artistic Movement Or Style:
- Cubism
- Dadaism
- Conceptual Art
- Artists Or Movements Influenced By This Artist:
- Conceptual Art
- Pop Art
- Minimalism
- Date Of Birth: July 28, 1887
- Date Of Death: October 2, 1968
- Full Name: Marcel Duchamp
- Nationality: French-American
- Notable Artworks:
- Fountain
- L.H.O.O.Q.
- The Large Glass
- Boîte-en-valise
- Place Of Birth: Blainville, France



Glass option is only available in size under 110 CM
