Chocolate grinder No 2, Oil paint, thread and
Hand Made Oil Reproduction
Hand-painted oil on canvas in your size and frame, made to order by our artists. ( Buy Print
Buy Image)
P118B $10
P118H $10
P118W $10
P438Z $10
P508JH $12
P508YH $12
P805H $10
P805Z $10
P919BZ $10
P919G $10
P919XJ $10
P959ZH $10
P968JZ $12
W106C $8
W218G $10
W218JH $8
W218Y $10
W307PJ $10
W316G $10
W316PJ $8
W316Y $10
W398PJ $8
W4111J $10
W500HY $15
W500JH $15
W692G $12
W849H $8
W940BG $15
W953PJ $8
Pick from our preset sizes that match the artwork's original proportions.
You may enter your own dimensions to fit a specific frame or space. If your selected size does not match the original image's proportions, we will either crop the artwork or extend the painting with additional hand-painted elements. A digital mockup will be sent for your approval before production begins.
Please note that the on-screen preview does not reflect the actual cropping or extension. Only the mockup will accurately show the final composition.
While custom sizes are available, we recommend selecting a dimension from the predefined list to preserve the original proportions.
After order, ArtsDot.com team will email client for instructions and provide a mockup preview
Worldwide Delivery () in 3/4 weeks instead of standard 5 weeks. (26 August). No compromise on quality.
Free Worldwide Express Shipping
High-Quality Linen Canvas
Full Shipping Insurance
Customs Tax Refund Guarantee
True Color Matching Guarantee
60-Day Return Policy (Defects Only)
100% Money-Back Guarantee
Bulk Discount Offer
Chocolate grinder No 2, Oil paint, thread and
Reproduction Medium
Reproduction Size
-
Total Price
$ 263
Artwork Description
A Paradoxical Vision: Reimagining the Everyday
In the vast landscape of early twentieth-century modernism, few works possess the quiet, unsettling magnetism of Marcel Duchamp’s Chocolate Grinder No 2. Painted in 1914, this piece serves as a profound threshold between the structured geometric explorations of Cubism and the radical, intellectual provocations of Dadaism. At first glance, the viewer is presented with a scene that feels deceptively domestic: a yellow chair with a wooden frame, possessing a singular, circular design featuring a central hole. Yet, beneath this seemingly mundane depiction of furniture lies a deliberate disruption of reality. The painting does not merely capture an object; it captures a concept, inviting the observer to look through the physical form and into the void of artistic intention.
The composition is masterfully arranged to evoke a sense of surreal stillness. As the eye wanders across the canvas, one notices the presence of other chairs and a dining table, all sharing an unusual, circular geometry that mirrors the central motif of the primary subject. The inclusion of a figure seated at the table adds a layer of narrative ambiguity, suggesting a moment of quietude that is simultaneously interrupted by the strange, mechanical-like design of the objects. For the collector or interior designer, this work offers a sophisticated tension—a way to introduce a conversation piece into a space that challenges the boundaries between functional decor and high-concept fine art.
Technical Precision and the Language of Form
While Duchamp is often celebrated for his "readymades"—the act of selecting ordinary objects and declaring them art—Chocolate Grinder No 2 reveals a much more traditional, yet equally subversive, technical mastery. Utilizing oil paint to achieve a smooth, luminous surface finish, the artist employs a level of precision that recalls the meticulousness of the Post-Impressionists. The wooden textures of the chair are rendered with such care that one can almost feel the grain beneath the pigment, creating a tactile reality that grounds the more abstract elements of the composition.
The technique serves a dual purpose: it provides a sense of hyper-reality that makes the absurd design of the "grinder" even more jarring. By using the light and shadow characteristic of classical oil painting to define these strange, perforated shapes, Duchamp forces the viewer to confront the object as something tangible and present. This juxtaposition of calculated accuracy with conceptual disruption is where the true magic of the piece resides. It is a technical triumph that uses the tools of tradition to dismantle the very idea of traditional representation.
A Legacy of Intellectual Provocation
To understand the emotional weight of this painting, one must consider the historical turbulence of 1914. As Europe stood on the precipice of World War I, Duchamp was already beginning to reject the aesthetic dogmas that prioritized beauty and craftsmanship over intellectual inquiry. This work embodies the genesis of conceptual art, where the "idea" becomes the primary driver of the creative act. The circular hole in the chair is not merely a design choice; it is a symbolic aperture, a way for Duchamp to puncture the illusion of the canvas and invite the viewer to question what is real and what is constructed.
For those seeking to adorn a contemporary space with art that inspires deep thought, a high-quality reproduction of this masterpiece offers more than just visual appeal. It brings into a room a piece of history—a fragment of the revolutionary spirit that redefined the twentieth century. Whether placed in a minimalist gallery setting or as a focal point in a richly textured study, Chocolate Grinder No 2 remains an enduring symbol of the power of the imagination to transform the ordinary into the extraordinary.
Related Artworks
Artist Biography
A Revolutionary Spirit: The Life and Art of Marcel Duchamp
Marcel Duchamp, born Henri-Robert-Marcel Duchamp in 1887 in Blainville-Crevon, Normandy, was more than an artist; he was a philosophical provocateur who fundamentally altered the course of modern art. His early life, though seemingly conventional – nurtured within a family that appreciated artistic expression with both brothers pursuing successful careers as artists – hinted at the iconoclasm to come. Duchamp initially pursued formal training, mastering traditional techniques and experimenting with post-impressionist styles. However, this academic foundation served not as an end in itself, but as a springboard for questioning the very nature of art, its purpose, and its definition. He wasn’t content merely to depict the world; he sought to challenge how we perceive it, and what constitutes artistic value. This restless intellectual curiosity would become the defining characteristic of his prolific career.From Cubism to Dada: A Rejection of Convention
Duchamp's artistic journey was marked by a constant evolution, a deliberate shedding of established norms. His initial engagement with Cubism, evident in works like *Portrait of Chess Players* (1911), demonstrated an interest in fragmented forms and multiple perspectives – a departure from traditional representation. Yet, he quickly moved beyond purely aesthetic concerns, recognizing that simply rearranging visual elements wasn’t enough to address the deeper questions swirling within him. The horrors of World War I fueled this discontent, leading Duchamp to embrace Dadaism, a movement born out of disillusionment and a rejection of logic, reason, and traditional artistic values. It was within the Dadaist framework that Duchamp truly began to dismantle conventional notions of art. He wasn’t interested in creating beautiful objects; he wanted to provoke thought, challenge assumptions, and expose the arbitrariness of aesthetic judgment. This period saw the birth of his most radical innovation: the ‘readymade’.The Readymades and the Subversion of Art
The introduction of readymades – ordinary manufactured objects selected and presented as art – was Duchamp’s most significant contribution to the 20th century. These weren't simply found objects; they were deliberate acts of artistic subversion. By taking an everyday item, like a urinal (*Fountain*, 1917), signing it “R. Mutt,” and submitting it to an art exhibition, Duchamp challenged the very definition of artistic skill and authorship. Was it the artist’s hand that created the work, or was it the artist's *idea*? This question became central to his practice and laid the groundwork for Conceptual Art. Other notable readymades like *L.H.O.O.Q.* (1919), a postcard reproduction of the Mona Lisa defaced with a mustache and goatee, were playful yet pointed critiques of art history and established cultural icons. These works weren’t meant to be admired for their aesthetic qualities; they were intended to provoke debate and force viewers to reconsider their preconceived notions about what constitutes art. Duchamp believed that art should reside in the mind, not merely in the eye.Legacy and Enduring Influence
Marcel Duchamp's impact on subsequent generations of artists is immeasurable. He fundamentally altered our understanding of art, paving the way for movements like Conceptual Art, Minimalism, Pop Art, and countless others. His emphasis on the artist’s idea – the concept behind the work – over its aesthetic qualities continues to inspire artists today.- Cubism: Early exploration of fractured forms and spatial representation.
- Dadaism: Rejection of logic, reason, and traditional artistic values in response to World War I.
- Conceptual Art: Emphasis on the idea behind the artwork rather than its aesthetic qualities.
Marcel Duchamp
1887 - 1968 , France
Quick Facts
- Artistic Movement Or Style:
- Cubism
- Dadaism
- Conceptual Art
- Artists Or Movements Influenced By This Artist:
- Conceptual Art
- Pop Art
- Minimalism
- Date Of Birth: July 28, 1887
- Date Of Death: October 2, 1968
- Full Name: Marcel Duchamp
- Nationality: French-American
- Notable Artworks:
- Fountain
- L.H.O.O.Q.
- The Large Glass
- Boîte-en-valise
- Place Of Birth: Blainville, France



Glass option is only available in size under 110 CM
